|
Section: Home > News and Events > PENEWS 4/2006
PENEWS 4/2006: PEN studies how Christmas
celebrations may help farmers
CONTENT: Taking stock at year end and looking ahead, two
good readings on deforestation and poverty and on fuelwood, and two
Central American PEN projects on baboons and Christmas trees!
1. TAKING STOCK AND LOOKING AHEAD
A year end is always a good time to take stock and make a few
plans (and promises?) for the new year. The murder of one of our PEN
partners, Vanessa Sequeira on 3. September in Acre, Brazil will
forever remain the darkest day in the PEN history. Another PEN
partner, Jacob Chengedzeni, had to discontinue his fieldwork in
South Africa due to security threats. These are reminders about our
vulnerability and the security issues facing everyone doing
fieldwork.
But, more than 20 PEN field studies are now on-going or completed
(4). 2006 became the year when fieldwork really took off, and PEN
will indeed become the large-scale and tropics-wide data collection
that we have envisioned! The research tools are well developed and
in active use. The interaction by email (and in some cases field
visits) between PEN partners and CIFOR researchers (advisors) is
good.
A few challenges lies ahead. The funding situation is still
uncertain, with two applications rejected in 2006, while another two
are pending. The PEN type of global level basic research has proven
more difficult to sell than we thought, as many donors want to see
visible impacts in specific countries. Another challenge for many
PEN partners (and the global PEN project) will be to move from data
collection to data analysis and paper writing. How to make sense of
all the numbers? How to use the PEN data to answer interesting
research questions?
With a steady stream of new publications, good synthesis and
overviews are invaluable for researchers to formulate such
questions. Below are two recent studies on deforestation and
poverty, and on fuelwood that may help in this process.
2. GOOD READING 1: AT LOGGERHEADS?
Is there a trade-off between poverty reduction and environmental
protection? A new comprehensive World Bank report, At Loggerheads?
Agricultural Expansion, Poverty Reduction and Environment in the
Tropical Forests, by Ken Chomitz et al. addresses this question, and
identifies opportunities for win-win policies. Using recent spatial
poverty and land use information, it demonstrates how deforestation
and poverty often overlap, but that the causal links are more
complex. The report introduces a stylized forest classification,
which is useful to structure a diverse reality: (1)
Forest-agriculture mosaic lands, (2) frontier and disputed areas,
and (3) areas beyond the agricultural frontier. These correspond
roughly to different zones of increasing remoteness, or
alternatively: level of development. The report is downloadable at:
http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510
&searchMenuPK=64187283&theSitePK=523679&entityID=000112742_20061019150049&
searchMenuPK=64187283&theSitePK=523679
3. GOOD READING 2: THE CHANGING PERSPECTIVES OF FUELWOOD
The most common forest product in many PEN study sites is
fuelwood and its cousin - charcoal. An excellent synthesis of the
fuelwood debate and the many studies is given by Arnold, J. E.
Michael, Gunnar Kohlin, and Reidar Persson. 2006. Woodfuels,
livelihoods, and policy interventions: Changing Perspectives. World
Development 34 (3):596-611. The article is based on a more
comprehensive CIFOR report, available at:
http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/Publications/Detail?pid=1197 Among their
findings: most of the ‘fuelwood gaps’ analyses were flawed and
exaggerating the crisis, fuelwood demand increase with higher income
among poor but not among middle income groups, fuelwood scarcities
rarely trigger investments in maintaining the resource base, but
declining access to supplies or markets can raise significant
problems in some areas.
4. PEN PROJECT 1: MIRIAM WYMAN (UNIV. OF FLORIDA):
CONSERVATION INITIATIVES, LAND-USE DECISIONS, AND FOREST COVER IN
THE COMMUNITY BABOON SANCTUARY, BELIZE.
Village names like Double-Head Cabbage and Scotland Half Moon
make you wonder if you have entered the world of Tolkien. But, they
lie within the Community Baboon Sanctuary (CBS), a small protected
area (4 800 ha) of 7 villages along 33 km of the Belize River.
Established in 1985, CBS landowners agreed to protect one of the few
black howler monkey populations (Alouatta pigra) in Belize. For 20
years CBS residents have been participating in two conservation
initiatives: nature-based tourism around the howler monkey, and a
voluntary, written pledge to protect riparian forests and forested
corridors, important howler monkey habitat. My dissertation research
will assess the effectiveness of these initiatives at protecting
riparian forest cover, and how to improve these initiatives for
conservation and community benefits.
An issue I encountered with the PEN survey concerned unprocessed
forest products. When residents only responded about timber I would
follow-up with questions about other forest uses, such as hunting,
medicinal plant use, firewood, fruits, etc.; then I got answers. The
general lesson: ask again, and in different ways to tease out the
information. Additionally, building trust and rapport with families
can never be stressed enough. There is a time investment but in the
long run, building these friendships increased the likelihood of
families participating in multiple surveys. Also, often in friendly
conversation before interviewing I would get valuable additional –
often sensitive – information.
An interesting finding is that over 1/3 of the households
interviewed receive remittances from the US. An important forest
product is the Cohune Palm nut (Orbignya cohune). Although not used
as extensively today, Cohune nut is still highly valued for cooking
oil production. In the village of Flowers Bank nearly every
household produces Cohune oil for home use and/or sale in other
villages. This laborious process is reflected in the sale price of
$5 US / quart. Cohune Palms are also often left in cleared fields as
shade for livestock. Lastly, during Iguana season (March) before the
female Iguanas lay, I found that primarily boys would hunt Iguanas,
which fetch between US $2.50 – $5 each. And did I eat Iguana while
in Belize? Well, as the saying goes, “When in Rome…”.
5. PEN PROJECT 2: PABLO PRADO: CHRISTMAS TREES AND LIVELIHOODS
Can a popular Christmas tree - an endangered endemic fir - be
part of a conservation-by-cultivation strategy and help improve
rural livelihoods? This was one of the questions the research team
from Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala & KVL (Denmark) asked,
and one year of fieldwork is soon to finish. Poaching of the
Guatemalan fir (Abies guatemalenis Rehder) was serious, thus any
policy recommendations had to deal with the threat of extinction. We
also wondered if its cultivation – to satisfy an increasing demand
from Guatemala City for Christmas trees - could play a positive role
in the local peasant economies. Even though we have not started to
analyze the data yet, several findings have helped us understand how
complex and challenging our rural reality is.
Along the way, we realized that this species plays a minor role
within local peasant livelihoods strategies, and those who do poach
its branches during the Christmas season are motivated by a ‘pull’
factor: every year the illegal harvesting of branches for decoration
purposes entails a good source of fresh cash to be spent during the
festivities. They are not ‘pushed’ by their lack of other income
sources. In short, it’s the demand from the capital city and not
local poverty that drives poaching. We now want to test using PEN
data the hypothesis that the poorest segments of these rural
communities are barely affected by the market dynamics of this
species. By the same token, those middle-income Christmas trees
producers might benefit from a captive market during the Christmas
season.
A particular obstacle for our survey was the national government
decision to authorize mining operations in the nearby areas, and the
concomitant suspicion from the villages to provide any information
to outsiders. During fieldwork we used both BSc students and local
enumerators, and the former helped both with the language barrier
and in building trust and reciprocity with the selected villages.
Despite the reluctance of some households to participate in every
round, the number of drop-outs was kept at a reasonable level. All
in all, our survey will surely allow us to draw well-founded
conclusions and build on what other organizations are currently
doing in the same areas. Hopefully, we will come up with sound
recommendations that will eventually help those marginalized rural
communities to ‘celebrate Christmas as well’.
---------
Green Christmas greetings and the very best wishes for 2007,
Arild Angelsen
PEN Coordinator
|