| ||
|
|
||
|
Landscape modeling using STELLA language In conclusion, STELLA is user-friendly and accessible to non-experts. However, though the basics are simple, when modelling all elements related to conservation and development outcomes of a landscape some complexity cannot be avoided. Figure 4 shows a part of the TNS landscape model and demonstrates the need for a structural framework for a complex model. Some elements of the model (e.g. “household income” or “elephant population”) can be placed in a frame and considered a sub-model. While it is enclosed in a separate frame, it maintains its relationship with elements outside the frame.
Figure 4. Components of STELLA model For example, Figure 5 shows a sub model “immigrants” The employment rate influences the immigration into the region, while income loss influences the migration out of the region. The employment rate is calculated in the sub-model “employment” and the loss of income in calculated in the sub-model “household income”. These parameters are than “copied” from one sub-model into the other, or when using STELLA terminology, they are “ghosted” and they appear as dashed circles in the sub-model “immigrants”. The interface of the model when using sub-models now looks like Figure 6. The arrows between the models indicate that a parameter has been “ghosted” from one sub-model into the other, in another way it indicates there is a relationship between the sub-models.
Figure 5. STELLA interface showing sub-model immigrants
Figure 6. STELLA detail showing sub-model immigrants Some examples are available where the STELLA modelling language was used to build scenarios addressing tradeoffs between conservation and development.
|
| Copyright © 2007 - 2009 - Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) Last Updated: Thursday, December 13, 2007 Site designed by CIFOR - Webmaster: webmaster-cifor@cgiar.org |