|
Scrooge or Santa?
Or The Challenge of Scoping a Model of Livelihood Decision-Making
at the Mafungautsi Forest Margins, Zimbabwe.
Mandy Haggith, Ravi Prabhu, Happyson Mudavanhu
This paper explores the challenge of scoping a system model. We
describe three aspects of the scope of a model: boundary, granularity
and conceptual scope. We reflect on these aspects through an example
of a model of the land-use decisions made in villages which border
on the Mafungautsi forest in Zimbabwe.
Boundary issues are about the outer limits of the model and in our
case these include which villages are included, the spatial extent
of the landscape represented and the range of social and political
influences treated as endogenous to the model. Scoping also involves
deciding on various issues of granularity, such as the smallest
units of social structure (e.g. individual, household or community),
the scale of the physical entities such as patches of land and the
timestep and overall duration of the model.
In addition to boundary and granularity issues, the scoping challenge
is also one of deciding on the conceptual or disciplinary scope
of the model, in the sense of deciding what factors are going to
be dynamic within the model (e.g. political factors such as power
relations and regulations; social factors such as family structures,
friendships, health and communication; psychological factors such
as knowledge, opinions and uncertainty; economic factors such as
wealth and prices; or biophysical factors such as weather, forest
quality and insect populations, not to mention fire). Conceptual
scoping is particularly difficult when working with a highly multi-disciplinary
team all of whom have different interests in the contents of the
model.
We describe the scoping decisions that we made in building the Mafungautsi
model, in which we were liberal and sought to encompass the interests
of all participants. These decisions now present us with a range
of serious challenges: the difficulty of model callibration, the
computational expense of running simulations, and the difficulty
for new users to understand the model.
We conclude that facilitators of modelling teams need to consider
whether they will be as generous as Santa Claus, by giving everyone
what they want and including all participants' ideas in the model,
or seem as mean as Scrooge by saying 'no' to many suggestions. In
hindsight we think that Santa's approach is liable to result in
an electronic Frankenstein, whereas Scrooge, though seeming miserly
at first, might end up giving us an electronic train-set that actually
works!
Download
Papers (62 KB)
Unlocking complexity
: the importance of idealisation in simulation modelling
Mandy Haggith & Ravi Prabhu
This paper is about idealisation - the process of finding simple
representations of the real world whilst conceptualising a model.
We reflect on the reasons for excessive complication in simulation
models and propose some enhancements to standard modelling methodology
which enable a more systematic approach to harnessing complexity.
There are three ways to limit complication in a model of a complex
real world context: by focussing the scope of the modelling process
onto a clearly defined issue; by idealisation of the elements of
the real world during model conceptualisation; and by simplification
of the implemented simulation program. Whilst all three of these
methods are appropriate in some circumstances, we argue that careful
idealisation has the most potential for increasing model tractability
whilst also generating insights during the model design process.
In the FLORES (Forest Land Oriented Resource Envisioning System)
project we have modelled social forest landscapes which are highly
complex. We demonstrate the benefits of idealisation through six
examples from this modelling work, covering a range of issues including
land tenure, forest management activities, conversion of forest
benefits into economic values, social diversity, communication,
collaboration and learning. Each example illustrates a different
method for achieving an idealisation which yields insights relevant
for policy players.
Download
Papers (27 KB)
Infectious Ideas:
Modelling the diffusion of ideas across social networks
Mandy Haggith, Ravi Prabhu, Carol Colfer, Bill Ritchie, Alan
Thomson and Happyson Mudavanhu
Will the practice of collecting wild honey wearing no clothes become
a widespread practice in Zimbabwe? Or will beekeeping take over
as the main way that people acquire honey? This paper describes
an exploratory modelling study investigating how social network
patterns affect the way ideas spread around communities. We conclude
that increasing the density of social networks increases the spread
of successful ideas whilst speeding the loss of ideas with no competitive
advantage. Some different kinds of competitive advantage are explored.
Download
Papers (22 KB)
A System Dynamic
Model for Creating Scenarios of a more Sustainable Forest Management:
An East Kalimantan Case Study
Herry Purnomo, Ravi Prabhu and Stepi Hakim
System dynamic is an effort to understand complexity of social and
eco-systems of forest. Through this understanding, a conscious learning
on interaction between people and forest will take place in order
to manage forest in more sustainable and equitable manners. A system
dynamic modeling was carried out in area surrounding Lumut Mountain
Forest, District of Paser, East Kalimantan. In the area, where legally
was allocated to a logging company, had lived local people who depended
on forest and rattan. The policy makers were trying to improve the
well-being of local people without scarifying the logging company.
Aim of the study was to give policy options to policy makers and
likely impacts of those options. The model used FLORES as a template
model, and then adapted FLORES model to meet local condition. The
built model comprises biophysical, social, policy and impact main
components. The model showed the change of impact indicators, which
are standing stock, community income, and concession revenue and
government income, given any selected policy option.
Download
Papers (369 KB)
CAMFLORES: A
FLORES-TYPE MODEL FOR THE HUMID FOREST MARGIN IN CAMEROON
Christopher Legg
A FLORES-type model in the SIMILE modeling environment is currently
being developed for three villages in the Humid Forest Benchmark
area of southern Cameroon. The benchmark lies on the northern edge
of the Congo Basin humid tropical forest and covers a gradient from
abundant (although logged) forest and low population density to
no remaining forest and relatively high population density. Farming
systems range from traditional and extensive to more intensive monocultures.
The modeling project is intended mainly to investigate the effects
of introduction of new crop varieties and improved farming systems
on the long-term maintenance of stable mosaics of forest and agriculture,
within the context of the international Alternatives to Slash and
Burn (ASB) programme.
Biophysical data on crops, natural vegetation and soils has been
compiled from IITA and other sources. Socio-economic surveys at
household and village level conducted by IITA have been linked to
actual locations of villages and houses and supplemented by additional
surveys. Boundaries of land-patches in the three villages have been
mapped using GPS, and details of land use and ownership recorded.
Maps of land-cover at village and benchmark scale are being prepared
from detailed and semi-detailed satellite imagery, using a nested
legend system that allows linking of maps at different scales. This
data enables the initial construction and parameterisation of the
model, and will permit the extrapolation of the results of modeling
from the villages to the benchmark, and ultimately to the eco-zone,
the Congo Basin humid forests.
The processes of collecting field data and building the model have
provided new insights into agricultural practices in the study area,
and into evolving land tenure systems. The prototype version of
the model involves only ten households and about 500 land patches,
and includes the three agricultural systems dominant in the southern
more forested portion of the Benchmark (mixed food / fallow systems,
forest melon fields, cocoa plantations) with no rental, sale or
other transfer of land. Decision making at the household level is
essentially deterministic, and labour productivity is constant between
households. This model is almost complete, and once this model is
adjusted and parameterised to run for long periods in an essentially
steady state, then the model will be applied to real data from the
three test villages. This will require the addition of new farming
systems, the introduction of modes of permanent or temporary transfer
of land, and modification of the decision model to render it more
realistic.
Download
Papers (1.15 MB)
Development of
Multi-stakeholder Scenarios of Forest Management: A Multiagent System
Simulation Approach
Herry Purnomo, Hari Priyadi, Yurdi Yasmi, Linda Yuliani and Ravi
Prabhu
International strategy of sustainable development urges forest management
to be carried out in a multi-stakeholder environment. The importance
of communities' participation in the forest management has become
a common statement in Indonesia, and it has been written in the
Indonesian Act 41 about Forestry (1999). However, how to implement
this act in the area where already allocated to a concession holder
is still unclear. The state owned company, PT. Inhutani II Sub Unit
Malinau, has managed the lowland forest in Malinau District, East
Kalimantan, Indonesia for over 10 years. They established permanent
sample plots for measuring growth and yield. However, current regulations
do not give the company a sufficient space to use PSP data for management,
nor does it allow systematic involvement of local communities in
forest management.
The aim of the research was to seek scenarios of sustainable secondary
forest management, which address the above limitations. The scenarios
were developed through simulation of social and biophysical components
in the area using a multi-agent system (MAS) which is a branch of
artificial intelligence. This paper presents the scenario development
process and the resulting scenarios for collaborative forest management.
The results reveal that MAS are a powerful simulation tool for development
of scenarios for sustainable dipterocarp forest management). Sustainability
was measured using indicators of forest cover and standing stock,
communities incomes, company revenue and taxes paid to the local
and central governments. It was also found that collaboration between
PT Inhutani II and the communities appeared to be the most suitable
alternative for sustainable forest management.
Download
Papers (207 KB)
Developing a
Collaborative Model for the Management of the Areas Surrounding
Lumut Mountain: A Qualitative Systems Analysis Approach
Herry Purnomo, Yurdi Yasmi, Ravi Prabhu and Stepi Hakim
Complexity of forest eco- and social systems in the areas surrounding
Lumut Mountain, Pasir District, East Kalimantan made a single perception
of it inadequate basis for good forest management. A common understanding
on how to manage such complex areas was developed through a collaborative
modeling process, in which all relevant stakeholders participated.
The model was built through identifying of the important components
of forest management, building a conceptual model using a causal
loop diagram and defining the performance indicators. The model
was then used for exploring qualitative future scenarios to improve
well being of local stakeholders and forest quality. Finally, action
roles of participants were defined to implement the chosen scenarios.
We found that this qualitative modeling process conducted in Pasir
was very effective in developing collective action.
Download
Papers (105 KB)
Social landscape and
resources mapping
V.Robiglio, W. Mala, C.Diaw
Social landscape mapping seeks to build the community's spatial
context through the integration of partecipatory SS methods with
GIS techniques. In the village a geographically accurate basic map
results from preliminary focus group discussions,GPS mapping and
integration of the data into a GIS.
The main geographical features and the spatial references indicated
by the group are represented. Further thematic maps concernig the
use of resources and their social appropriation are produced during
the following focus group discussions using transparent sheets and
the basic map as a reference. Again the various informative layers
are included in the GIS. The social landscape
map is used here as part of the spatially referenced information
for modelling. The Land use mosaics built through Remote Sensing
and GPS mapping for the modelling acquires its social reason.
Download
Papers (853 KB)
Mapping landscape systems
at different scales
V.Robiglio
Landcover maps at scale 1:20000 are produced for the modelling villages.
A Landcover map at a scale of 1:100.000 is implemented at the regional
level. This type of data will be used for the constructon of the
model and for its parametrization and validation. Working on land
cover and land cover dynamics using data of different spatial and
spectral character requires the implementation of a descriptive
system able to guarantee the harmonization of the different levels.
The correspondence of the polygons at the two levels of resolution
used here, is maintained using a nested legend developed from the
FAO Land Cover Classification System. The nested legend
is conceived to be applicable to all types of land cover maps that
will be produced in the area covered by ASB project, in order to
maintain the possibility of aggregating/incorporating and disaggregating/breaking
out, classes according to the level of detail required and realistically
obtainable maintainig a certain internal consistence.
The land cover map at the village level is an important tool to
complete the information abut the land cover and land use types
not directly linked to the presently farmed land mapped for the
modeling. The characterization of the village in terms of land cover
types gives important insights into the availability and potential
use of resources like timber, NTFP, wild meat and other forest products.
It is easy to analyze the impacts of different uses and the pressure
exerted on the forest resources in terms of agricultural land use
at the single hamlet and village level but also of the forestry
use in terms of selective logging and of the presence of infrastructures
connected to the activity of timber extraction.
Download
Papers (1.2 MB)
The
Simile visual modelling environment as a platform for FLORES
Robert I. Muetzelfeldt and Jasper Taylor
Simile is a visual modelling environment that
has been used for most model development within the FLORES research
programme. It has a number of features which make it uniquely placed
to meet several key requirements for FLORES modelling. First, it
enables models to be designed diagrammatically, using a visual notation
that is closely related to standard flow and influence diagrams:
this supports the involvement of all stakeholders in the modelling
process. Second, it has the expressiveness needed to handle the
original conception of a FLORES model: collections of households,
making strategic and short-term decisions about multiple patches
of land on a spatial basis, with complex social relationships such
as tenure operating. Third, it can generate computationally-efficient
model implementations (as C++ programs), allowing it to handle considerable
model complexity. Fourth, the model input and display tolls can
be readily customised to meet the needs of particular model users.
Finally, it supports modular modelling, enabling models to be rapidly
customised by swapping particular submodels.
In this paper, we discuss our experiences in using
Simile for the development of FLORES models. We consider the interesting
- and frequently ignored - interaction between the technology available
for modelling and the design of the models made using this technology.
We also consider the use of Simile for developing a range of models
of human-forest interaction, at different levels of detail, and
the thorny problem of scaling up from village to region.
Download
Papers (298 KB)
Beyond modeling: Using
participatory modeling approaches as tools for group communication
and social learning
Standa-Gunda W, Haggith M, Mutimukuru,
T Nyirenda, and Prabhu R
The paper reviews the usefulness of models
as tools for social learning through group participation in developing
future scenarios. We assess the potential to use participatory modeling
as a way for local people to explore the consequences of their actions
and in the process review the benefits of innovative initiatives.
By developing group-based scenarios that can be simulated in a model
framework, the paper argues that this process can be used as a vital
step towards increased community interaction, and social learning.
We develop scenarios based on natural resource issues that the community
would have thought pertinent to them. In this regard we foresee
the scenario building process focusing on either poles, honey, land
or broom grass. The strategies required to attain any given future
scenario are then expressed as casual loop diagrams. These diagrams
are meant to reflect the opportunities and constraints that the
group expects to encounter in attaining the future scenario.
In this paper we give focus to the process of
developing the model rather than the model itself. It is the intension
of the model development process to create new awareness amongst
the facilitating team and local participants. Hence, we recognize
the strong linkages between the model development process and the
on going participatory action research as components of the reflection
loop. Below is the schema of the framework that we will use in relating
some of the core issues bridging participatory modeling and social
learning.
Developing linkages
between urban fuelwood demand and the environment: A bioeconomic
systems model
Muyeye Chambwera
Wood fuel consumption in the urban areas of most
developing countries contribute to the depletion of woodlands in
and around urban centres. Fuel wood is an alternative source of
energy for most urban dwellers. It is used in combination with or
in the absence of other sources of energy such as kerosene and electricity.
In most urban areas, a market for fuelwood has emerged over time,
with the commodity being traded on an almost competitive basis.
The market is the linkage between consumers and the sources of fuelwood.
Understanding the linkages between household economic activities
on one hand, and the supply of fuelwood on the other, facilitates
the development of policies and strategies aimed at minimising impacts
of energy consumption on the environment on one hand, and enabling
consumers to improve their welfare on the other. Such a win-win
situation can be achieved by considering and simulating the motivations
of all agents involved, and understanding how these are transformed
into physical entities like fuelwood demand. This paper develops
a systems model incorporating household socio-economics, market
economics and the response of natural woodlands to demands made
on them by harvesting for energy provision in urban areas. Harare
is used as a case study. This paper focuses on the development of
a systems model using simile, representing the key variables of
the urban-fuelwood-environment system, and testing the effects of
changing states and trends of different variables on the state of
natural woodlands.
Download
Papers (31 KB)
A
Multi-Objective Analysis of Catchment Management Options in Chivi
District, Southern Zimbabwe
Peter G.H. Frost, Witness Kozanayi and
Osman Mubachi
Modelling the interactions between people and
natural resources requires us to understand what motivates people,
what criteria they use to evaluate possible courses of action, the
rules governing decision-making, and how all these vary with site,
time and circumstance. This paper explores this theme in the context
of a study aimed at identifying the most likely viable options available
to communal-area farmers in semi-arid Zimbabwe to manage their soil,
water, crop and vegetation resources within small catchments. An ancillary
problem was to understand what might be the relative costs and benefits
to farmers of managing their private lands in contrast to taking part
in managing common-pool resources. The management options were evaluated
using multi-criteria analysis (MCA) packaged in the multi-objective
decision-support system 'Facilitator' . The study was carried out
in the Romwe and Mutangi communities in Chivi District, Zimbabwe,
in March 2001.
An array of options were evaluated, covering possible
courses of action or alternatives for managing ecological processes
affecting agricultural production. They included constructing contour
ridges, dead-level contours, fanya juu furrows, or infiltration
pits; tillage practices such as mulch ripping and tied ridging;
planting vertiver grass strips to control run-off and erosion; gully
reclamation; controlled grazing; live fencing; agroforestry; using
inorganic fertilisers; and applying organic soil amendments to arable
lands. These options are carried out on different parts of the agricultural
landscapes of the region, and involve activities at a range of scales.
They require different levels of community organisation to implement.
Most of them require substantial time, labour, equipment and other
inputs, as well as sometimes skills and advice. Although they are
not wholly mutually exclusive, they all potentially compete for
people's time, labour and resources, so that those devoted to one
option cannot simultaneously be available for others. Moreover,
the benefit streams differ, with some benefits being localised,
delayed or hard to discern, while others are more widespread, immediate
and apparent.
The decision criteria were identified and evaluated
in conjunction with the local people and were as follows: construction
labour; financial cost of construction; loss of arable land; need
for skills; need for extension advice; need for plant material;
maintenance frequency; maintenance labour; need for tools, traction
power, and transport; reduced soil erosion; improved yields; improved
soil moisture and soil fertility; improved grazing; increase of
wood and NTFPs; increased cropland area; immediacy of benefits;
scale of impact; promotion of pests and disease; transaction cost;
and spiritual benefits. The criteria selected were presumed to cover
the range of factors likely to affect the decision as to the preferred
option. The relative scores for the criteria for each option were
established through key informants interviews with 48 local farmers
(35 in Mutangi - 25 men, 10 women; 13 in Romwe - 10 men and 3 women).
The criteria are not necessarily equally important, but the scores
were not weighted. 'Weighting' was achieved instead by adjusting
the order of entry in the analysis (i.e. through ranking). Related
criteria were nested within 'composite criteria' before analysis.
In the analysis of possible physical options
for managing the catchments, the preferred options all related to
the management of privately-managed dryland fields. The top three
options were increased use of inorganic fertilisers, the addition
of organic matter to the soil, and either tied ridging (Mutangi) or
mulch ripping (Romwe). In general, perceptions were broadly similar
at Romwe and Mutangi, though there were some minor differences between
men and women. The criteria that people considered most important
were those relating to improvements in soil quality. Major constraints
appear to be the lack of plant material (for agroforestry, live fencing
and planting vertiver grass as an erosion control measure), the need
for extension advice, tools, knowledge and skills, and the labour,
monetary and transaction costs associated with public works. The immediacy
of benefits seems important; outlays need to be recouped sooner rather
than later, especially in constrained situations.
Multi-criteria decisions support tools seem useful
in helping identify and provide insight into some of the constraints
and opportunities perceived by farmers. Prospective decisions can
be assessed relatively objectively, with the outputs providing a
basis for further discussion and deliberation. The understanding
developed during this process could enhance the development of more
complex models of people-resource interactions. Since the outputs
of the MCA are sensitive to the order in which the criteria are
entered into the analysis, Facilitator could perhaps be used in
a hindcasting mode, in which the order of entry of the criteria
is manipulated to reproduce a known preference, determined by some
other means, thereby establishing what might be the key criteria
underlying the choice. Aggregating the criteria into broader composites
tends to diminish the differences among the options, suggesting
that clear-cut choices may be based on one or a few over-riding
criteria, rather than on some complex mix.
This research was funded partly by the Australian
Centre for International Agricultural Research (Project LWR2/96/163
"Enhanced Resource-Use Planning in Tropical Woodland Agroecosystems")
and the UK Department for International Development (DFID Project
No. R7304 - Zimbabwe: Micro-Catchment Management and Common Property
Resources). This acknowledgement does not imply the endorsement
of either agency for any of the views expressed.
Download
Papers (24 KB)
Application
of new tools: Exploring the synergies between simulation models
and participatory research in smallholder farming systems?
John Dimes and Steve Twomlow
This paper reviews the experiences of ICRISAT and NARS partners
in exploring the synergies between systems simulation models and
farmer participatory research in smallholder farming systems in
southern and Eastern Africa. The research focus is improved soil
fertility management at the farm household level, under circumstances
of resource constraints and climatic risk. It describes the attributes
of a simulation tool for application in the smallholder farming
systems and the role that this tool has played in enhancing the
soil fertility research agenda and the on-farm participatory research
process. Applications in smallholder farming systems to date include
analysis of trade-offs for alternative resource allocation, prioritizing
research agendas by identifying 'Best-Bet' options and contributing
to learning about farm management practices via computer aided discussions
with farmers. Within the latter, important synergies emerge: farmer
input helps to guide the simulation analysis around current and
changed practice (that is feasible), while simulation outputs provides
estimates of the range of responses possible for a given technology
and ultimately the risk associated with variable climate and management
conditions.
Download
Papers (145 KB)
|
|