Printer Friendly

Illegal logging:The need to look beyond the chainsaw

CIFOR News Online No. 46
CIFOR’s strategy 2008 - 2018
DG's Message
CIFOR’s new strategy focuses on six research domains
Staying the course on the road to Copenhagen
Coming to terms with forests and climate
REDD goes green
4th World Conservation Congress
Asia Pacific Forestry Week
Forest Day Central Africa
Landscape approaches for forest conservation?
Japan Day: Sharing science & success
Two symbols, one solution
Blanket ban on bushmeat trade could have dire consequences for poor
Illegal loggingThe need to look beyond the chainsaw
Forest governance and decentralisation in Africa
Sharing knowledge & strengthening links
Forests, human health and the impacts of climate change
Mitigation and adaptation: Two sides of the same coin
From conservation to innovation: Building capacity for smallholder teak farmers in Central Java
Improving livelihoods through landscape management in West Africa
Australian Government funds REDD research
Forests & conflict: A catalyst for change?
Staff Update
CIFOR Board of Trustees

"What is the impact of small-scale logging operations on the national economy? On urban and rural livelihoods? On biodiversity?” asks CIFOR’s Paolo Cerutti, in Cameroon. Photo: Marieke Sandker

Since the 1990s, global concern over illegal logging in tropical forests has grown. Numerous initiatives have been established and agreements signed to promote the sustainable use of forest resources and combat illegal forest practices.

The European Union’s Action Plan on Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) is one of the most comprehensive and ambitious attempts of timber-consuming countries to reduce illegal logging.

However, a lack of understanding of what causes illegal logging jeopardises the success of any action, according to CIFOR researcher Paolo Cerutti.

“Although there is a lot of concern about illegal logging, the real nature and extent of the phenomenon are often unclear, as many developing countries don’t produce comprehensive data about their forestry sector,” says Cerutti.

He describes the situation in Cameroon, a country that is often thought to have a high amount of illegal logging.

“Since data is scarce, it’s hard to prove the extent of illegal logging in Cameroon. And if you don’t know exactly the problem, it’s hard to find effective solutions,” says Cerutti.

“The amount and quality of data about industrial wood production and export in Cameroon have improved in recent years, but we don’t know much about logging for the domestic market.”

“What is the impact of these small-scale logging operations on the national economy? On urban and rural livelihoods? On biodiversity? This lack of data makes it very difficult to propose viable policy options for the logging sector.”

In order to gain a better understanding of the scope and impact of the domestic timber markets in Central Africa, CIFOR will conduct a two-year study in Cameroon and Gabon, the main timber exporting countries in the region.

"Although there is a lot of concern about illegal logging, the real nature and extent of the phenomenon are often unclear, as many developing countries don’t produce comprehensive data about their forestry sector."

Paolo Cerutti,
CIFOR

The data collected will assist the governments in shaping their forest policies. The information will also help the European Union, and other external partners, to assess the impacts of FLEGT and other forest policies on sustainable forest management and livelihoods.

Small Logging Enterprises"

CIFOR research has shown that illegal logging and exports in Cameroon have not been as prevalent as some figures suggest. Research has also revealed that illegal logging in the Central African country is partly caused by small-scale operators who have no legal options to harvest timber.

“While international attempts to reduce illegality in the forest sector tend to focus on industrial logging, the problem is to some degree at the local level,” explains Cerutti.

“Bureaucracy and regulations that don’t take into account the specific circumstances of small-scale operators have obstructed the efforts of these informal businesses to operate legally. Improving the professional skills of these entrepreneurs and regulating their activities could have a big impact on both livelihoods and illegal logging.”

Voluntary partnership agreements

One of the elements of the EU’s FLEGT Action Plan is Voluntary Partnership Agreements (VPAs) with timber producing countries that wish to eliminate illegal timber from their trade with the EU. The agreement involves a licensing scheme and a definition of “legally-produced timber”.

Cameroon is one of the first African countries to negotiate a VPA with the European Union.

While the agreement is likely to include a reference to livelihoods, to ensure that any action against illegal logging is fair and equitable, exactly how this will be achieved is not yet clear, according to another CIFOR researcher, Guillaume Lescuyer.

“To measure the impact of FLEGT on livelihoods, you need more data about the informal timber sector in the country. How many people work in this sector? How much money do they make? What logging method do they use? What is the impact on the local biodiversity? These are questions we will try to answer with this study.”

Story by Janneke Romijn, CIFOR


James Clarke
Media Liaison & Outreach Manager
CIFOR, Jalan CIFOR
Situ Gede, Sindang Barang
Bogor Barat 16115
Tel: +62 251 8622 622
Fax: +62 251 8622100
Mobile: +628121134889
j.clarke@cgiar.org
Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
CIFOR advances human wellbeing, environmental conservation and equity by conducting research to inform policies and practices that affect forests in developing countries. CIFOR is one of 15 centres within the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR).